If You Are Aristotle,How Will You Explain The Invisibility Of The Force Causing Some Of The Violent

If you are aristotle,how will you explain the invisibility of the force causing some of the violent motion

 

Answer:

INVISIBILITY OF THE FORCE CAUSING VIOLENT MOTIONS

Answer:

Aristotle would say that a consistent power causes steady (violent) movement. Galileo would say that a steady power would make an article accelerate or dial back.

A stones regular propensity, whenever left alone and unsupported, is to fall, however we can lift it, or even toss it through the air. Aristotle named such constrained movement violent movement rather than normal movement. The expression violent here means that some outside power is applied to the body to cause the movement.

Normal movement was believed to be either straight up or straight down in light of the fact that it was objects that would look for their regular resting place. Violent movement is forced movement on the grounds that is it the consequence of powers like a push or pull.

Violent movement alludes to the activity important to move things evenly. Not at all like normal movement which happens unexpectedly, violent movement doesnt occur without activity. The possibility that something must consistently push objects blurred the clarification

INVISIBILITY OF THE FORCE CAUSING VIOLENT

Explanation: